Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animation vs. Minecraft shorts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Animation vs. Minecraft shorts[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a series of animated shorts, not making any properly sourced claim to passing our inclusion standards for web content. Other than the fact that it exists, the only notability claim being made here is of the "got X number of views on a streaming platform" variety, which is not an automatic notability freebie in the absence of actual media coverage -- but this article, as written, is completely unsourced. As always, notability is not "it exists", but "it has enough media coverage about its existence to pass WP:GNG on the sourcing" -- and nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have any proper sources. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unreferenced, no clear notability. This should've been speedied/prodded. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking significant coverage. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.