Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animation Patterns
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Animation Patterns[edit]
- Animation Patterns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research, essay, something made up at Stockholm University one day. This is a proposal, not documentation of existing, verifiable, material. Corvus cornixtalk 21:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An OR project, as explicitly stated in the article itself: "The idea is hence to use this WIkipedia page to define Animation Patterns together with peers." Nsk92 (talk) 21:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR. Stifle (talk) 22:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Another new one, but the reference doesn't check out. (It's on g-books, but no mention of "animation patterns" or "stockholm"; even searching for "patterns" finds nothing relevant.) Looks like WP:MADEUP. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 00:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this isn't even an article. JuJube (talk) 02:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Indeed, this isn't an article; it's a template for some folks at a school to use to help one another. There's not even an assertion of importance here - Did someone speedy this? It certainly deserves it. Merenta (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.