Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AnimationToolkit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Electronic Arts . MBisanz ^talk 05:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AnimationToolkit[edit]

Contested proposed deletion. I reiterate my reason made in the prod: I cannot find any reliable secondary sources via a quick search here that can establish any notability of this game engine. Note that the search I made generated a bit of false positives. MuZemike 04:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 04:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —MuZemike 04:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral It is hard to find reliable source for game engines. I could only find this and this. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The second one shows a conflict of interest with the subject. MuZemike 05:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A proprietary animation software used by one company with no sources to suggest that it's even remotely notable. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 05:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This article had a Prod template up with the text "I cannot find any reliable secondary sources via a quick search here that can establish any notability of this game engine. Note that the search I made generated a bit of false positives.". Then once the template changed to "The article may be deleted without further notice since this message has remained in place for five days. This template was added 2009-03-23 22:38; five days from then is 2009-03-28 22:38." an IP kept deleting the template to stop deletion (without doing any constructive edits, even after I reverted one of his deletions. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Electronic Arts or appropriate child article, per WP:PRODUCT. Marasmusine (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources. —bbatsell ¿? ✍ 01:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.