Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anika Apostalon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Closing my own AfD because the article has been speedy deleted G5 as it was created by a banned editor. Black Kite (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anika Apostalon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

College-level swimmer that doesn't pass WP:NSPORTS. Previously deleted by PROD, which of course can't be repeated. Black Kite (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Finding independent news sources establishing notability:

https://swimswam.com/2017-w-ncaa-analysis-stanford-returning-308-individual-ncaa-points/
http://pac-12.com/article/2017/02/20/usc%E2%80%99s-anika-apostalon-named-women%E2%80%99s-swimming-and-diving-scholar-athlete-year
http://dailytrojan.com/2017/03/30/usc-womens-swimming-earns-10-academic-honors/

Bfpage _{let's talk...} 23:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The first does not provide indepth coverage. The other two are no better than press releases, from publications too highly connected to the college she competes for to show secondary indepdent coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no evidence of any notability. PamD 15:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
comment i find the comparison with Andrew Hatch and Seth Tarver instructive. apparently winning an NCAA event is not NSPORTS? any consensus for that judgement? Marthacustis (talk) 17:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep USC PICKS UP BIG TRANSFER FROM SDSU ALL-AMERICAN SPRINTER ANIKA APOSTALON, Swim Swam and Swimming World Magazine is an example of in-depth coverage. Seeing lots of Google News results including ESPN, more Swimming World Magazine, Swim Swam beyond primary sources. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Meets WP:SPORTCRIT. Hmlarson (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing in-depth to establish notability. Vile Jeremy (talk) 21:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Article needs expansion, but that's quality, not notability. She is an NCAA champion, highest national level in the sport, additional sources have been found. Meets GNG. Montanabw^(talk) 10:35, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Add [1] Provides biographical information and an updated background on her swimming career from her most recent institution
'Add [2] She recently competed in her first professional swim meet at the TYR Derby Pro Swim Meet on April 29, 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxd130 (talk • contribs) 03:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:GNG. Hack (talk) 02:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.