Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anibar International Animation Festival (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural Close as another AfD nomination on the same article is currently open. Add the deletion nomination rationale to that and stick to one place. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anibar International Animation Festival[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no WP:N proof based on WP:RS Rosenhaven (talk) 13:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural speedy keep while another deletion discussion running at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anibar International Animation Festival is still open. I'm trying hard to assume good faith, but I have to agree with MichaelQSchmidt's analysis that Rosenhaven is a Single Purpose Account. Their only goal seems to be the miscrediting and removal of information on this particular festival. Moreover, a Google search shows that the Anibar Festival has received international attention so it should be possible to improve the article. De728631 (talk) 14:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost any article could be improved. I do not see notability established in this article (nor anything resembling a reliable source). --Nouniquenames (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious speedy close as another deletion discussing is still going on. Take the debate there please. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 14:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other discussion seems to be a nomination withdrawn by the proposer (to fix a procedural mistake). Further, there is both a Keep and Delete posted. As such, it seems to qualify as WP:SK#NOT --Nouniquenames (talk) 15:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.