Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angola–Bulgaria relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angola–Bulgaria relations[edit]

Another X-Y country relations article that may not meet WP:N. tempodivalse [☎] 03:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no sources to indicate a notable relationship. There may have been one under Communism, and it's true Bulgaria sold arms to both sides in the Angolan Civil War, but there's probably not enough there to write a viable article. - Biruitorul ^Talk 03:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notable relationship. LibStar (talk) 05:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 12:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep User:Biruitorul points out precise reasons why the relationship is notable. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], and on and on they go. It seems to me that many of these nominations smack of WP:RECENTISM. --Russavia ^Dialogue 13:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not for miscellaneous information consisting of juxtapositions of countries noting whether they have diplomatic relations. Edison (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above.Biophys (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. --BlueSquadronRaven 15:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Russavia. -- llywrch (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, me too for the reasons brought by Russavia. I also agree regarding the problems with recentism in quite a number of these sort of rfd.--Aldux (talk) 23:43, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia ^Dialogue 11:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.