Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique (porn star)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 22:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angelique (porn star)[edit]

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the deletion. If this one is going to be deleted, then there are HUNDREDs of articles on various people of all professions that need to be deleted as they are shorter than this one and have even fewer references. I nominate that this article simply needs more work and time to develop. Hobbomock (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - What? I never mentioned article size, or number of references, I nominated it because I feel that it fails to meet the notability criteria of WP:PORNBIO. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't meet WP:PORNBIO. Xeron220 (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It was extremely difficult to find reliable sources with a one named actress and none was found to verify notability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An earlier article about the same performer, Angelique dos Santos, was AfD'd and deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique dos Santos. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete CSD G4 per Malik Shabazz then Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I didn't mean to suggest that this article was a recreation of the old one. In fact, the current article is significantly different from the previous one. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 01:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Apparently the page has been vandalized and the biography is now gone, however previous versions of the page don't lie. Delete as per above. I don't see why this wasn't speedied to begin with... Lady Galaxy 23:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Put your clothing on, Angelique, the NN gig is up! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caution - the nominator says in his personal page he is 16 year old. I am curious about the legality to engage a discussion about porn with a 16 year old in come countries. Hektor (talk) 05:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he's already put up lots of AfDs concerning porn... Lady Galaxy 18:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails our criteria for inclusion (both notability and verifiability). Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.