Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelina Loo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:16, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina Loo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable dentist autobiography sourced to her own website. Orange Mike | Talk 19:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. As a dentist she has won at least one award (but that is unlikely to be enough for Wikipedia's notability standards). As the founder of a charity what she has done has been mostly done over the last couple of years. There are a some mentions in community press. She's probably a borderline case but for the worthwhile charity it would be nice to keep the article. Her charity was voted in to a $100,000 donation from Pepsi. That's impressive too and is likely to have received some local community press. Nipsonanomhmata ^(Talk) 20:29, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- reply - I'd refer you to WP:NOBLECAUSE on this argument. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails under scholar. No news mentions for charitable work. The charity Spring for Kids should be considered for deletion as well.Novangelis (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've actually cleaned this up a good deal, so it's much less spammy than the original, but I don't really think she meests the notability criteria, same with the charity. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm sure she is a good dentist and a fine citizen, but Wikipedia requires proof/verification, and there is none. I could find no mention of her or her charity at Google News Archive or at Google Scholar. I couldn't even find confirmation that she was president of the British Columbia Society of Orthodontists (not that I'm doubting it, but it doesn't seem to have generated any notability). --MelanieN (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. No third-party sources that would allow for a pass of WP:GNG have been provided, and a news search did not turn up any. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As much as I want to keep this for the charity, the arguments against it are far stronger. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete promotional pieceCurb Chain (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.