Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) clpo13_(talk) 06:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Angelaki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic journal. Fails WP:NJOURNALS (not included in selective indexing services) and WP:GNG. An article from this journal had a brief spate of notoriety on Twitter due to an argument between the author and Richard Dawkins ([1], second paragraph), but I don't think that translates into notability of the journal itself. clpo13_(talk) 18:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Indexed in multiple selective databases (see here). Easily verifiable by using some of the links on my user page (with pre-formatted references. Article can be expanded using the advice at WP:JWG. --Randykitty (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, looks like I didn't search hard enough. Withdraw given Randykitty's evidence that WP:NJOURNALS is satisfied. clpo13_(talk) 06:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.