Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Owen-Taylor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 08:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Angela Owen-Taylor[edit]
- Angela Owen-Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable municipal politician. Grahame (talk) 06:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 06:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Not decided on this one yet. In general Local Government politicians (other than capital city mayors) are not notable but she is a member of the Brisbane City Council, the largest LGA in Australia by population, with a population larger than Tasmania. -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the Brisbane City LGA isn't your typical LGA, and I would assert that any councillor of the BCC is notable. To compare, Owen-Taylor represents about 23,000 voters, while your average member of the South Australian House of Assembly represents around 20,000 voters. This may also be moot, as there seems to be enough sources that she meets the GNG anyway. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep - given the unusual nature of the Brisbane City Council, as well as her seeming prominence within the press (she is referenced pretty frequently by the looks of things). – Toon(talk) 01:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Lankiveil. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Brisbane City Councilor has got to be as notable as Chicago city councilor, New York city councilor, etc. In other words, perfectly notable. --Mr Accountable (talk) 06:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.