Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Moya Acosta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus and defaulting to keep. There have been a series of related AFDs on other Black Spring prisoners, and they all have a similar result. I do find the argument set forth by the "keep" side more well-thought out, since they relate to the sourcing and international attention, rather than a quick reference to a policy. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Moya Acosta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tied to just one event. Damiens.rf 15:29, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E. Grsz¹¹ 15:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Black Spring (Cuba) as a plausable search term. Lugnuts (talk) 09:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Every individual included in Amnesty International's list demonstrates international coverage, and usually for significant things. Their descriptions always provide enough information to write an article--which could be fuller than the present one. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Coffee // have a cup // ark // 17:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG's analysis. The fact that a large group of individuals is associated with a particular event does not mean that is the only event relating to ther notability, and prisoners of conscience, especially those recognized by Amnesty International, typically have generated significant nontrivial coverage for their activities. In this case, the article cites multiple events supporting notability, making the BLP1E argument plainly invalid. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Hobit (talk) 05:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per DGG and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz UltraMagnus^speak 10:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.