Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel J. Holcomb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice. It't not an A7 as there is an assertion of importance but it's almost an A1. It may be possible to write a sourced article on this subject so I'm going to close this as "delete without prejudice" so if somebody does write a new sourced article, it won't be subject to CSD G4. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Angel J. Holcomb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Without references, there is no indication that this specific animal (a cat) is notable. Bringing to AfD since I just contested a misplaced BLP PROD. VQuakr (talk) 19:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete my mistake with the BLP PROD didn't realize its an animal, but with no reliable sources its impossible to determine notability. Also a quick google search doesn't bring up anything. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 19:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and make that speedy, if possible. Without any sourcing, there's no really credible indication of notability. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 21:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.