Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ang Mo Kio Secondary School National Cadet Corps (Air)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ang Mo Kio Secondary School National Cadet Corps (Air)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable uniformed group. Fails GNG. R22-3877 (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. R22-3877 (talk) 04:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. R22-3877 (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sub-organizations within secondary schools are rarely notable. I even doubt most university level ROTC units are notable, but this is more similar to JROTC, which I expect to be about as likely to be notable as a high school sports team, if not less likely.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with possibly very selective merge to Ang Mo Kio Secondary School (I was about to !vote merge - but seeing there are no sources to back up this long chunk of text - doesn't seem like much is mergeable). The 65 strong after hours unit does not meet GNG, not does it seem likely it ever will.Icewhiz (talk) 08:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable for stand alone article as noted above. Kierzek (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think we established somewhere that high school cadet units are rarely notable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.