Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anett Griffel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Anett Griffel[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anett Griffel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN bio - fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 16:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Estonia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. MODEL not inherently notable. No compelling sources, just a short list of agencies/gigs. 128.252.154.2 (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete only primary sources provided. Could not find significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Just ran a google search, did not find a good source to sustain this article. Unfortunately it not notable for now. Epcc12345 (talk) 06:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.