Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Vital
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Andy Vital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely non-notable person, with an entirely unreferenced article (which appears to be written by someone too close for comfort). His job in itself is no reason for inclusion in Wikipedia, and I cannot find any reliable sources that discuss him in depth--the only reliable mention I can find is this. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources. - User:Supergabbyshoe 16:22, 02 May 2010 (PST)
- Delete. He appears to be a nice guy, and has reported some important stories, but he is not notable. Bearian (talk) 17:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.