Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Cave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Cave[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see possible improvement here but I'm not sure if it's enough so I'm taking it to AfD for comments and consensus; my searches found quotes such as "[one of] Britain's leading mountaineers", "acclaimed, internationally acclaimed, well known and renowned author", "one of Britain's finest mountaineers", "top climber", "one of the greatest mountaineers of his generation", "one of the world's most respected mountaineers", "one of the most respected mountaineers in the world" and "world famous" in various sources from my various searches here, here, here and here. He may be very well known in the UK and his mountaineering but I'm not sure if this is improvement and time-worthy. If he is notable, I'm willing to make the improvements myself (the article needs improvement from its current state). SwisterTwister talk 18:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:21, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable prizes for his books in his field. That's sufficient DGG ( talk ) 18:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep The nomination does not contain any reason to delete — just some waffle about possible improvements. AFD is not cleanup. Andrew D. (talk) 16:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.