Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Bishop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash^talk 00:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Bishop[edit]

Googles as a striker for UK non-league York City soccer club. Article unreferenced. Subject may be notable and worth an article, but from the contributor's username it's possible this version qualifies as vanity. RobertG ♬ talk 14:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I doubt he's notable. I don't think we're in the habit of creating articles for every football player in the world are we? It's certainly not wikified! Dan 17:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I think any professional footballer is notable enough. Needs tidying, though ArtVandelay13 18:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but expand. Professional footballer in the conference is notable enough to me, especially considering he was York's top scorer last season. Englishrose 19:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep arent professional sportsmen auto keeps? 80.177.152.156 22:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable(?) football player. I've cleaned it up. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-03 22:38Z
Delete what? Every Conference player is notable? Hell no! Grue 09:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment,what about a former Blackburn Rovers player? What about being York's top scorer? Englishrose 12:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep. he's a top dog. Kingturtle 06:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.