Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrey Kaykov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey Kaykov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. I could only find a few softball interviews with Kaykov and profiles on film sites in Russian. Roles do not appear to be notable, nor are they in particularly notable films. Does not pass WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability guidelines for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG, no in-depth coverage in reliable sources about this person, the biography taken from junk sites with questionable reliability.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 05:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR, only one reliable source (other does not seem reliable)....not deserving of a Wikipedia article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.