Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Willis (RAN officer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Willis (RAN officer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe that this person meets WP:SOLDIER. Although the MVO is not as common as being awarded an OBE for example I don't believe that the MVO makes him notable Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't see which WP:SOLDIER criteria this guy would meet. NickCT (talk) 13:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Run of the mill, mid-ranking officer. The MVO is not nearly high enough for notability on its own. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is primarily the curriculum vitae of a middle-ranking officer. It says very little about his receipt of the MVO and it is unlikely anything more could be said. The article does not establish or claim any particular notability of the subject. Dolphin (t) 22:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. MVO is down the VO list. Not that high an award, and rank does help towards WP:SOLDIER either. Doesn't meet WP:GNG from what I can see. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.