Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Stewart-Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 18:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Stewart-Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable; just a case of TOO SOON. Quis separabit? 02:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's not the strongest keep I've ever done, but there's just enough here for him to pass notability guidelines. If it were just the role for Gotham I'd argue for a redirect to the cast page, but I found that Stewart-Jones has had at least one film role that has resulted in him gaining some substantial coverage in reviews (The Good Guy) and has been in a few plays where he's been repeatedly highlighted in multiple reviews and articles. I do want to note that I did find mention of him in some of the articles about Mr. Popper's Penguins, but I didn't look too closely at those since he wasn't a named character. In any case, there's just enough asserted notability here to where I think he squeaks by notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: Stewart-Jones has a long list of TV guest credits, including some recurring parts, before Gotham. His role on that show is major and based on an established character from the comics. He's also been in a few widely-distributed films. The short version is that he's a notable actor and deleting his article would leave a gap.Bjones (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I found lots of sources easily, such as this, that, and yon, so he passes WP:GNG. That's not even including the (possibly biased) Fox radio and New York Post, which are owned by the same News Corp that owns the station that runs Gotham. Bearian (talk) 01:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.