Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Spear

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 02:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Spear[edit]

Andrew Spear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable author of 3 non-notable books, in the adjacent nominations. Reading the refs, they are pure PR or local coverage. DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I was unable to find any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources about either this author or his books. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:55, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is some light coverage, but not enough to really show how he's notable enough for an article. There is a concern of COI here as well, as a little digging brought up some concerns that the article creator and the author are the same person. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.