Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Richardson (Dorset cricketer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Richardson (Dorset cricketer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in my searches. Störm (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A thoroughly non-notable figure, and I live in Dorset myself. RobinCarmody (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't found sufficient coverage that makes him a notable cricketer Rondolinda (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NCRIC due to not having played at the highest domestic level – irrespective of the status afforded individual matches, playing for one of the minor counties does not meet this standard. More importantly this also fails GNG, with no significant coverage found (only passing mentions in local routine cricket reports, and the usual wide-ranging databases) and no reason to expect that any exists. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.