Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Paul Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Paul Thomas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable startup guy who is the chief revenue officer for a video doorbell company that has got some press in the States. Currently it fails WP:NOT on several points (promotional, simple directory listing) and it also fails the relevant notability standards (BIO, GNG, ANYBIO). Deletion is the best option here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 17:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - maybe Skybell will be notable enough someday to warrant its own page, but even then this guy won’t also need one. He’s just a typical entrepreneur. Way too many of these guys for them all to warrant inclusion just because they raised some money on Kickstarter. Shelbystripes (talk) 23:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what is with more and more CXO titles. CEO, CFO and COO were understandable. But Chief Revenue Officer?John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 00:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A currently non-notable entrepreneur. Fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.