Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Logan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Logan

Makes a lot of claims, but no real assertation of notability. He's had his art everywhere, but I don't see any reliable sources about him. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:19, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant Keep he's been written about and seems recognised by the press which presumably gets over Notability issues - one of 20 'celebs' in this [1] and known for his Alternative Miss World [2], and seems to be a Derek Jarman short film about him [3] article about him and his museum on BBC [4] though that is local news section.-Hunting dog (talk) 19:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh and in the collection of the National Portrait Gallery [5], that provides an independant citation for the "retrospective was held at the Museum of Modern Art, Oxford, in 1991" *walks away muttering IDONTLIKEIT...* (modern art not anything personal to the BLP)-Hunting dog (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Claims" are assertions of notability, TPH! And in this case they are mostly justified. Certainly notable, though more referencing needed. He was most famous before the internet age, but there will be plenty in print. Johnbod (talk) 22:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Works in the NPG and the Arts Council collection [6] (it's a Flash site, but he'll show up if you search his name).--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems like an article with worthwhile potential...Modernist (talk) 04:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.