Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hypes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Vanamonde (talk) 07:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Hypes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage to meet MUSICBIO or GNG. Coverage is a single local paper and social media. Jbh ^Talk 02:41, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 05:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 05:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Subject meets 1 & 10 of WP:MUSIC for producing music for television show. Has significant coverage from independent, secondary sources. Passes WP:GNG. –haggforlife (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it stands NMUSIC #1 requires actual decent RS coverage, and so does keeping it as a BLP - David Gerard (talk) 09:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks significant coverage. Majority of the sources appear to be the same insignificant regional community newspaper/site. The IBM site solicits self-generated content that endorse IBM products. The only decent source appears to be Respect magazine, but that's only one, which is not enough. The subject (not the article) may be a case of WP:TOO SOON. ShelbyMarion (talk) 01:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above, it would be delete but he has been featured in very credible magazines. I did a quick Google search and found some. Succeeds WP:gng. seanhaley1 (talk) 23:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Suspicious account: Please note that the above contributor has recently created an account, rapidly made 10 edits and then started !voting on multiple AfDs, many of which don't make sense. See Special:Contributions/Seanhaley1 for their edits. There is a possibility that this is an undisclosed paid editor/canvassed editor/sockpuppet who is probably voting on multiple AfDs to hide the actual target. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- strictly a vanity page on a non notable artist; WP:TOOSOON applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.