Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Gotzmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 18:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Gotzmann[edit]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lacks notability. Fails WP:ACADEMIC. In addition, heavily promotional page which not comply with Wikipedia's neutrality policies. Fails WP:PROMOTION. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninanu123 (talk • contribs) — Ninanu123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 20:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- This looks like a sufficient body of work on an important subject for us to keep. However I find it difficult to work out how much of it is an article or chapter in a book and how much whole books. I note he has won a prize, but I do not know its significance. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable scholar. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 17:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The chair he holds at Erfurt may by itself qualify him as notable. This article could use more clearity, it does not need deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.