Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Silvestri

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Silvestri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Andrea Silvestri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Not a full professor. scope_creepTalk 07:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, Trying to prove the argument by the negative, doesn't work at Afd, or indeed, in life itself, generally speaking. The subject is a adjunct professor, so WP:PROF doesn't apply and there is insufficient research to prove notability. So it falls to WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 16:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SPA editor, probably them in person, himself. scope_creepTalk 11:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at each reference in turn, supplied by the SPA.
  1. Company page. Not independent, not secondary. No indication of notability.
  2. Proves that he is employed at the university. Does not prove notability.
  3. Proves that he is employed at the university. Does not prove notability.
  4. Proves he is on a scientific committee. Does not prove notability
  5. Won a non-notable legal award. Does not prove notability.
  6. Proves he is a good tax lawyer. Does not prove notability. All of them fail WP:BIO. He doesn't achieve WP:NPROF. scope_creepTalk 11:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tax Awards 2016. A non-notable award. scope_creepTalk 11:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
these you are doing are subjective evaluations. If we were to decide independently the notoriety of each teacher on wikipedia, 80% of the pages should be removed --151.36.245.180 (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear IP editor: the relevant standards for notability of people are given under WP:BASIC. If you want to make a difference here, you need to show substantial coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. See also WP:THREE. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IP, regarding the comment on teacher articles, see WP:WHATABOUTX. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. He is a prominent figure in the legal field, also at an international level, and this is shown by the fact that he has received several awards, such as the following:- Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500 EMEA international legal directories list Andrea as one of Italy’s major tax law experts;- TopLegal Awards named Andrea Tax Lawyer of the Year in 2013;- Legalcommunity Awards named the Tax Law Department, that he coordinates, “Firm of the Year – Tax” in 2016.He also writes for important economic magazines and newspapers such as Il Sole 24 Ore https://www.sulpl.it/images/Il_Sole_24_Ore_22_Aprile_2020_compressed.pdf --5.170.242.80 (talk) 11:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC) — 5.170.242.80 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Speedy keep. you need implementations or modifications of the template, but not the removal of the page. I propose to add all these new info and sources --Loreferri (talk) 11:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC) — Loreferri (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Two more WP:SPAs who arrived at 12:34 and 12.41 respectively. Probably WP:SOCKs. scope_creepTalk 11:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, its not the point of notability, and Afd isn't a vote counting system, its a discussion. Your two references count as passing mention, again a strong indication that the person is non-notable. scope_creepTalk 10:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrea_Silvestri&oldid=974291371"