Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andras Miyagi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be draftified on request to WP:REFUND (though not by me). Sandstein 13:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andras Miyagi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominated it earlier once, but at the request of the OP, I withdrawn my nom as they convinced me the article was at it's initial stage, and they will improve it. Now, it seems the development has been done, and I'm afraid, it still doesn't fit in.

There is no significant, in-depth and independent coverage that qualifies the subject to meet GNG, there are just lots of wrestling databases and some routine event coverage. Wrestling titles are irrelevant to notability since pro wrestlers are considered entertainers and not athletes for SNG purposes. Tame (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Wrestling, and Japan. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I noticed that you nominated the article of Andras Miyagi for deletion for the second time. Please consider that I am still working on the development of the article since Miyagi is an important freelancer. I am trying to find the best palpable references for the article, picking them from various sources such as promotion sites and certified wrestling analitic sites (for example Pro Wrestling Insider). I know wrestlers like herself are just entertainers and not really athletes. That is why I am trying to find these kind of refs to help the subject of article get as relevant as possible. Also please note that the article has plenty of links to other notable wrestling-related articles such as important events or wrestlers, thing that somehow hints the relevancy of the article's topic. Best regards. User:JeyReydar97 (talk) 10:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify and then let it pass through WP:AfC, since the creator thinks that the article can be improved. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MPGuy2824, I did some lookups for 10 mins straight, and couldn't really find much of in-depth or significant coverage. All are just, as I previously mentioned, trivial coverage and stats. I'm a AFC reviewer myself, and if it comes my new pages feed, I would decline it if not improved significantly, and I'm sure, other reviewers also will do the same.

@JeyReydar97, since you keep insisting, I guess 7 days is a lot of time for improving refs. You keep improving it, and let others vote. If no thorough discussion takes place, I'll relist it, and by then, you may finish improving it? Although I'm not sure how, unless you have access to unindexed pages which I couldn't find via Google and Bing. And one suggestions, if you feel the article is not fit for mainspace, then please work on it keeping at as a draft, when you drag something into mainspace, and it comes to page reviewers' (such as mine) attention, we are to AFD or CSD them if we see fit. I already gave you like2-3 days since the first nomination. So yeah, let's see how you improve it. Regards. -- Tame (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - WP:NOTIMELIMIT. WP:AGF. GaryColemanFan (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The onus is on those seeking to include or keep content to provide the necessary references, and failure or refusal to do so can result in deletion. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.