Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andexelt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andexelt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

declined proposed deltion. There's a lack of sources which discuss the album independently of the artist. Walokia (talk) 04:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have incorporated three reviews into the article; enough coverage to satisfy WP:NALBUM. gongshow talk 04:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Because article has been improved significantly by Gongshow. It now changed from this poor shape to now this. It is also important for closing Admin to not forget, the nominator Walokia (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock and has been blocked indefinitely. — Ammarpad (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.