Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anchalpur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anchalpur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been around since 2015, but I have to ask, Why? It purports to deal with a street in Bhairahawa, Nepal, but makes no claim of notability and contains no references. In the first day of its existence, it was tagged for speedy deletion, the (misapplied) tag was replaced with a prod tag by an admin, and the article was deprodded by its creator. In any case, I can find no online evidence that this satisfies WP:GEOROAD. Deor (talk) 22:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability asserted, and I cannot find any reliable sources to support any claim of notability. Appears to be just another street. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator and Kinu. Appears to be a run-of-the-mill and non-notable subject. — Goszei (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just an ordinary street, with no indication of being notable. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found info that the road actually exists, but nothing more than news of a regional festival [[1]] and an unfortunate petroleum station [[2]]. This wouldn't even work as a redirect to Siddharthanagar, the alternate name of Bhairahawa, since there's zero substantive content that can be sourced. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.