Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anasoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anasoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable company - fails WP:ORG Codf1977 (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Codf1977 (talk) 20:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete recently deleted as a G11 and G12, non notable, no non trivial sources, couldn't find any.—Sandahl (♀) 23:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Being in a top-10 rank somewhere, should be notable Dew Kane (talk) 03:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Cannot find significant coverage in secondary sources; the rankings are merely listings. Owing to large number of same-name companies all over the world, initial google hit count is deceptive. Ray^Talk 19:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.