Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananya Soni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ananya Soni[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model. 2 trivial mentions on News, nothing on Newspapers. Some hits on Books, but again, mere mentions, shockingly nothing on Scholar, and zip on Highbeam. Her titles and runner-ups don't meet notability criteria. If kept, article would also need a large re-write for POV issues, non-encyclopedic tone, and lacking in-line citations. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Either Move back to Draft: from where it escaped far too soon, or delete if there is no obvious hope of finding sources that verify notability. The nominator's rationale is one I cannot add to. Fiddle Faddle 16:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I was going to move it back to draft, where it had been declined twice in AfC, but after researching it, couldn't really find anything to show they are notable. I have nothing against moving it back there, however, but if there aren't better sources out there which I couldn't find, that may be simply wasting time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As mentioned, no significant coverage in Google Newspaper Archive, Google News (other than a one-paragraph blurb that doesn't pass the triviality threshold), Google Books, JSTOR, or Highbeam. Searching via the tools in WP:INDAFD doesn't reveal anything substantial. Interviews with the subject exist, but they are primary sources. There is a small amount of coverage here, but I feel it is not significant enough to meet WP:GNG. /wia /tlk 16:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable and written like an advertisement by a PR agency. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The cited sources do not meet WP:BASIC, and the only additional probably-reliable source I could find was the Fashion Weekly interview (already mentioned by Wikiisawesome). It's a primary source and not arms-length, as it's Soni talking about Soni with no independent analysis. The article could be draftified, but unless and until there's a major development in her career, I can't imagine it being approved at AfC, so deletion seems the kindest course of action. Worldbruce (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now and draft and userfy again later if needed, as I along with several other users (Wikiisawesome and Stabila711) attempted to help this user not resubmit immediately for review and instead add any more available sources for solid notability and acceptability.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.