Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Srivastava (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anand Srivastava[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject still fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG as most of these citations are mere mentions, quotes from the subject, or official statements from the local government. This article was already deleted once for good reason. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and India. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second AFD for this instance of the article but it is at least the third AFD because a previous instance of the article was deleted at least once. I recently did an AFD nomination during NPP, it was deleted but that deleted was reversed on the basis that it was a soft delete. My rationale during the previous nomination was: "No Indication of wp:notability. The most that any of those numerous references discuss him is covering his appointment to his position. All of the others are just coverage where he was either mentioned or quoted in a news story about something else. Article was previously deleted." Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 20:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Indian Police Service just a indian govt job, not a notablity criteria Worldiswide (talk) 04:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet of Wiki97828)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Appears to be a routine police position, nothing different than any such person in the service. Sourcing is largely of various things he was involved with at work. Oaktree b (talk) 23:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly giving interviews, or helping an older lady, which is fine but the article is barely a few paragraphs. Oaktree b (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete most of coverage is routine, or comments made as a senior police officer, not WP:SIGCOV about him. LibStar (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.