Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Srivastava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

Just wanted to note that previous deletion of this article was 8 years ago for copyright problems so it wasn't on grounds of coverage or notability. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anand Srivastava

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Indication of wp:notability. The most that any of those numerous references discuss him is covering his appointment to his position. All of the others are just coverage where he was either mentioned or quoted in a news story about something else. Article was previously deleted. This review was during NPP. North8000 (talk) 15:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. fails in WP:GNG. lack of notablity Worldiswide (talk) 06:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.