Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Prakash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anand Prakash[edit]

Anand Prakash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This 25-years old person had some coverage in newspaper when he found a bug in facebook and other apps. He looks like a bug bounty hunter. He has published an app providing platform for bug bounties. He is low-profile individual and may be an example of WP:BLP1E. I think he fails WP:GNG because has not garnered sustained coverage. The article is promotional and violates NPOV. Nizil (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He is listed in forbes 30 under 30 and I would like to all gentleman to check the notability of the person on your own. but I think this report is complete bullshit.

please help me here user:shellwood This is enough do one go ahead with deleting it I have no respect left for wiki open policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruggyman2 (talkcontribs) 18:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 19:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The wiki page seems to be genuine but probably written from a fan's perspective. I think it should be on wikipedia but definitely needs to be improved. There is lot of media coverage on this person in 2015,2016,2017,2018 . also list in forbes 30 under 30 list of Asia in 2017

Google search results on him


Edited article removed promotion, added more references which may show notability of the person. Please check now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.227.7.201 (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No evidence that they pass GNG. Isingness (talk) 02:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.