Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anamika Chawhan
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anamika Chawhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails GNG , No Significant coverage Iamfarzan (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Iamfarzan (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 04:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. h-index of 3. So unlikely to qualify for WP:NACADEMIC. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete "business and life skills coaches" are a dime a dozen. Just being one does not make one notable, and there are no clear claims to notability in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I didn't found sufficient coverage that meets general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 19:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.