Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anagha Janaki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anagha Janaki

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article lacks in depth coverage in reliable sources and doesn’t qualify per general notability guidelines. Celestina007 (talk) 16:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Really not much in the Deccan Chronicle nor the Times of India. Very early in her career and not made a mark as yet. What reference are in the article are woeful. Solid delete. scope_creep^Talk 16:16, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page is genuine and informations are accurate because it’s about a well known actor in Malayalam film industry that I personally know . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.16.82 (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The best source appears to be The Hindu article about the film Prakashante Metro, which says that this actor plays one of the leads (though IMDB doesn't even have her in the cast list ...?). But it's not clear yet that the film is a notable production, and even if it is, it seems to be the only one in which she has a (possibly) significant role, so it is WP:TOOSOON. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.