Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Rodriguez (Miss Texas USA) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Rodriguez (Miss Texas USA)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This woman is a pre-school teacher who happened to win a state level looks contest four years ago. This accomplishment is best present in context on a list (as suggested at WP:NOPAGE). Delete and insert a redirect to Miss Texas USA. Previous nomionation did not use the more applicable NOPAGE argument which does not require finding that there is no notability, it just deals with presentation. Legacypac (talk) 03:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 03:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 03:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 03:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as her notability is for winning the Miss Texas USA title and notability is not temporary. Subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds with significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Notability is a threshold, not a competition, and inaccurately describing the Miss Texas USA pageant as a "looks contest" reveals the nominator's motives for this swath of simultaneous deletion attempts. - Dravecky (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did not address NOPAGE. These are not called ugly contests, the contest is restricted to women, and they include swimsuit competitions - what do you call them? Legacypac (talk) 19:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep and at best also simply redirect also as mentioned above as the article may at least be notable for being crowned Miss Texas USA, yes maybe only marginally notable, but this may not be a deletion priority yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See also WP:NTEMP which says "In particular, if reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." Legacypac (talk) 20:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: What's up with the seemingly derogatory "this woman is a pre-school teacher" comment? Many famous people go on to be drug addicts, porn stars, or perpetual reality show contestants. Being a teacher is far more honorable than that. As to notability, this article had THIRTY references when it was nominated for deletion, a number of them have significant coverage of the subject. I don't have time to review every AFD from this nominator, but there is reasonable cause to be concerned about the legitimacy of a number of these nominations.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Dravecky. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste rapid vote with no time to evaluate anything. Legacypac (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did do evaluation before I voted. This AfD has been sitting open for nearly two weeks, so there was plenty of time to do it, and to assume otherwise is in very bad faith. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The copy paste denial suggests otherwise. How about providing a link to some substantial coverage of this person or some actual analysis of how this person passes guidelines like WP:NTEMP, WP:NOPAGE or WP:NMODEL. Legacypac (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.