Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Ferariu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 01:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Ferariu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the requirements of WP:NBASKETBALL. Generated a couple of human interest stories when she attended Drexel University with her sister but her college career was mediocre and I've not found anything recent that meets WP:SIGCOV. The article claims that she now plays in Romania with CSU Brașov although I found no database confirming this (might be a COVID-19-related problem though). In any case, players in the Liga Națională (women's basketball) are rarely notable. Pichpich (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 19:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we lack adequate sources of Significant coverage to the level required by GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG with sources now in the article. With these sources from the American Philadelphia Inquirer and the Romanians Monitorul Expres, ProSport and B1 TV, Ana has more significant coverage than the recently kept Adam Filipczak. Alvaldi (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts on the recently added sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, with the sources now there the GNG is satisfied. Moonraker (talk) 02:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets GNG per the sources listed above by Alvaldi. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.