Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Colja (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Colja[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm just not finding enough coverage (English or Slovenian) to justify a pass per WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Slovenian & French WP articles are translated versions of this one (or this is a translated version of one of them; whichever) and don't have any unique sources to use. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lack of sufficient reliable-source coverage. Hard to gauge exactly how much that 2002 Mirror magazine article actually contained, but it's a single source that's hard to verify, and we generally ask for multiple sources. ~ mazca ^talk 18:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.