Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Inconvenient Truth 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An Inconvenient Truth 2[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was the original author of this page way back around 2012. Looking at the page today, it really doesn’t serve a useful purpose: the tv series an inconvenient truth 2 was a one off broadcast and is no longer available to watch anywhere; the sources linked to. E.g news articles are almost all broken links now.
— 82.32.45.57, Special:Diff/1022775501

Hi, can you see my message on the inconvenient truth 2 edit history, please? I’d be grateful if you could schedule the whole page for speedy deletion
— 82.32.45.57, Special:Diff/1022777028

Kleinpecan (talk) 01:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Kleinpecan (talk) 01:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As there was a previous AfD discussion, I can't apply a db-author tag and call it a day, but delete per original editor's request. Nate • (chatter) 01:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don’t think this will generate any discussion as it’s a very old article; could we go ahead with delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.45.57 (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete! Oldwillowbombadil (talk) 11:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. A 3 x 22min episodes series that aired on a very minor TV channel and generated little notice in mainstream media. Amazon is not a suitable source, SoGlos is a dead link to a local paper, Kristianstadsbladet.se is a dead link to a Swedish regional paper, the Wilts and Gloucestershire Standard is a local paper, Talk York is a dead link to unknown media, TimeOut perhaps but that’s a dead link too, The Yorker is a student magazine produced by students at the University of York. I can’t find any evidence that there is any long lasting interest in the series. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all others that participated so far. Dr. Universe (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.