Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Mercer-Bailey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Amy Mercer-Bailey[edit]
- Amy Mercer-Bailey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local political activist and member of the local town council. Delete per ample precedent that being a councillor does not confer notability. Timrollpickering (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:POLITICIAN - just a local official, nothing really newsworthy even. Bearian (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not meet POLITICIAN, GNG or NOTABILITY. Kittybrewster ☎ 19:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as simply non-notable politician, WP:POLITICIAN, and perhaps WP:GNG. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.