Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Crain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Crain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crain was Miss Arkansas in 2014. Not only is that about all we know about her that is notable, that is almost all we know about her at all. The coverage is all from either hometown media or from her college paper. This leads to flash in the pan coverage, but nothing lasting that rises above the level of one event. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with nom. 10 references, eight of them different, looks impressive. They are all, as far as I can tell, reliable and local. It must be noted that all of them, every single one, reference Miss Arkansas in 2014, a single event (WP:BIO1E), that does not pass the threshold of notability (also WP:Notability (people) and WP:GNG) for a separate article. Otr500 (talk) 02:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable individual. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.