Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amulet (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 22:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amulet (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not cite importance Hoponpop69 (talk) 19:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The German entry indicates that the group charted in Norway, which meets WP:MUSIC. I do not have confidence in the WP:BEFORE work done here based on the nomination rationale. Chubbles (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep insofar as I was able to add a citation for the chart. The albums earlier than that might fail album guidelines, though. Geschichte (talk) 11:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep there is not much news on them, but having the Top 100 album would mean they meet WP:MUSICBIO. Expertwikiguy (talk) 23:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Two albums had low chart results in Norway and lasted only three weeks in total on the charts (https://norwegiancharts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Amulet). If the charting had produced some actual press, and not just web store pages, which is what the German site showed, and https://www.punknews.org/review/3226/amulet-danger-danger, I would have to agree that MUSIBIO was met, but it did nothing to contribute to their notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I read that as "they had two albums that hit the charts in Norway". One of them came close to breaking the top 10; that's WP:MUSIC by a mile. I don't see why we'd require digging up Norwegian music magazines from 2003 to further bolster the claim (though, of course, that'd be a nice bonus for article improvement). Chubbles (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Based on the sources found citing charting in Norway.Hoponpop69 (talk) 12:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Since the nominator has now !voted keep, we can speedily close this. Chubbles (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per reasons above. Article is good enough to pass WP:NBAND. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.