Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amritha Aiyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amritha Aiyer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject-specific notability guideline demands significant roles in multiple notable films.

But, I'm afraid that she has starred in only two films and two isn't multiple.

Our general notability guideline demands non-trivial (preferably sustained) significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.

I'm afraid that she fails on those grounds too.

Overall, this looks like a quasi-poor AFC-accept of a declared-paid-article by Dial911.I'll say she ain't passing our notability-benchmark, at least as of now.

Best, ~ Winged Blades^Godric 14:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR and is WP:TOSOON for now. FITINDIA 13:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Winged Blades of Godric: Definition of multiple indicates (as I would generally believe anyway) that multiple can most definitely mean 2. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a valid point but not in the wiki-sense of notability-assessment.~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Winged Blades of Godric: - why not? If notability assessment is dependent on either 2 or more that would seem significant. And if they've defined multiple differently they need to both do so in each location and pick a different word. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's my understanding of the current community-consensus in actor-related AfDs.....You are free to differ:)~ Winged Blades^Godric 13:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom two isn't multiple and its WP:TOOSOON. GSS (talk|c|em) 19:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep for nowHeshiv (talk) 05:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Reasons?~ Winged Blades^Godric 06:58, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete two roles can be enough, but I'd expect more coverage than we have here; the discussion of her and her roles is minor in the sources. The article does feel promotional. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:44, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.