Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amon-Ra St. Brown
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amon-Ra St. Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet Wikipedia:CFBNOTE and may be WP:TOOSOON. No notable achievements with so far during his college career. GPL93 (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.GPL93 (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:GNG with ease.--Yankees10 17:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete probably WP:TOOSOON, the best sources are about his family, not about him. SportingFlyer talk 21:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Weak Keep/Merge there's a significant amount of coverage about his family and he's a part of that as highly rated prospect. Possibly worth an article about the family? Note: yes, I'll copy the same to his brother's AfD as I created that one after finding this and not that StarM 00:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)- Delete and Merge Most the information on this page can be moved to the personal life section of his brother's page GPL93 (talk) 01:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with your location, but not deleting. No reason to lose the history/content. It can be trimmed StarM 22:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- keep feature articles like this one really point to Notability.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'd say the article points more to that his family is notable, not the individual. None of the 5 points in the article focus specifically on Osiris or Amon-Ra. GPL93 (talk) 20:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- The title is "5 things to know about the wide receiving St. Brown brothers as Stanford visits Notre Dame" --Paul McDonald (talk) 20:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, as SportingFlyer pointed out earlier most of his coverage are more about the family as a whole than the two younger brothers.GPL93 (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- The title is "5 things to know about the wide receiving St. Brown brothers as Stanford visits Notre Dame" --Paul McDonald (talk) 20:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This article is specifically about him. So is this. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 13:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Split view over Keep vs Merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Split view over Keep vs Merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep definitley passes WP:GNG. this is about him as well. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:30, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Significant coverage in the Chicago Tribune, LA Times, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and Bleacher Report. Passes WP:GNG.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG by a mile. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 17:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.