Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amna Nasir Jamal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amna Nasir Jamal[edit]

Amna Nasir Jamal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a journalist, referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage shown at all. There's a potentially valid claim of notability here as a winner of an entrepreneurial award, but that's not a notability freebie in the absence of media coverage about her winning of the award. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better than this. Bearcat (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I find no substantial independent coverage of her. As for her claimed activities and achievements: Except for a website called www.santribune.com that seems to be empty, I can't find evidence of any publication called either SAN Tribute or Globe Sentinel. If they exist, they are certainly not notable. Google findings for "International Women Entrepreneur Challenge", besides a couple of pages on the site of a photographer who worked one of their events, are exclusively cases where the organization's award appears on one person or another's list of achievements, so it isn't a notable award. Largoplazo (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not enough secondary sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.