Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit K. Saiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Phroziac^(talk) 18:50, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Amit K. Saiya

del vanity. mikka (t) 06:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as vanity. Peruvianllama 06:18, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Apyule 08:07, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, at least not notable now. --Bhadani 12:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC) boldfaced vote for clarity -- PacknCanes 17:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google turns up 3 hits, one of which is User:Hall Monitor's talk page. PacknCanes 17:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have to keep it unanimous. This qualifies as vanity. Though Mr. Siaya seems to have great potential, he does not appear to have accomplished anything of true note at this time. I'd recommend he come back in a few years! el_amante 21:35, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity of no particular note. My humble apologies to BD2412 for not catching this earlier on my talk page (just saw it now). Hall Monitor 22:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Please see Harmonie Research Foundation as well, as this article was also created by 59.92.x.x and also appears to be non-verifiable. Hall Monitor 22:55, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was subsequently reposted as Amit K Saiya and Amit Saiya. -- RHaworth 09:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]