Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Apollo Barman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as moot. Article has been speedily deleted under WP:CSD#A7 by User:Jimfbleak. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Apollo Barman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the contested PROD: Insufficient evidence of the multiple, significant coverage that the notability guidelines indicate is required for inclusion in Wikipedia Eeekster (talk) 23:56, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Blatant autobio with no independent reference. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 03:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, possible speedy. Hairhorn (talk) 03:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - autobio of a non-notable. (Removed a bit of vandalism; don't know if I got it all.) --Orange Mike | Talk 17:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete (You didn't. I got a bit more...) If there was evidence for any of this - hang on, there is... Apollo Software appears to be a project of his at NJIT - http://web.njit.edu/~aab25/projects.html and from his CV it looks like he's looking for an IT job as of 2011. Peridon (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.