Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amirsalar Davoudi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amirsalar Davoudi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yes, there is plenty of press coverage of him, but it is all for one event. That is not sufficient for an article, per WP:BLP1E Hugsyrup (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Hugsyrup (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Keep, He is notable as a human rights activist lawyer who has been imprisoned for his activities. Further the article has been changed after it was put on AFD, so It should be re-evaluated. Alex-h (talk) 10:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:00, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Keep. I added another RS to help establish notability. Regarding WP:BLP1E, I think this person does not meet points 2 and 3, so that policy doesn't apply. Anne drew 14:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Delete per Hugsyrup Saff V. (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per WP:ONEVENT. There was a burst of reliable coverage over his sentence, but that is not lasting WP:SUSTAINED coverage. Unjust sentences that garner bursts of coverage happen all the time in the world, so unfortunately the subject of this article isn't remarkable. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.